Showing posts with label Kurds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kurds. Show all posts

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Your Other Left: Sectarian Doldrums



Every journalist, public intellectual and mouthbreathing tv personality has an opinion on what western strategy should be in Syria in light of the Russian involvement.  It makes for a chaos in perpetual regeneration. However, the vacuum we've created in Syria by our inaction and the lack of leadership from president Obama and Mr Cameron having now been filled by the vile dictator Putin might make western strategy more simple.  That is if we operate under the assumption we take advantage of the opportunity.

Many Sunni Arab nations in the region have been unwilling to take action against ISIS and in many cases have been supporting the Islamic State materially and strategically.  This is because the dominant concern for the Sunni regimes is the threat posed by the rogue axis of the Syrian Ba'athist Alawite regime of Bashar Al Assad, the Shia twelver rapture cult IRGC, and their protector Vladimir Putin.  Setting aside the many severe human rights offenses and the warped ideological export regime in Saudi Arabia and the embarrassment that is Turkey under the AKP and the unabashed Hitler loving islamist Erdogan, it isn't difficult to see their point.  Saudi Arabia and Turkey have long been allies to the west.  Saudi Arabia is actually surprisingly eager and cooperative in diplomatic matters despite their vile domestic barbarism and their fetish for pushing wahabbi islam on the world, and Turkey has become a serious liability in recent years after only being a problematic partner in the Cold War.  Perhaps AKP lobbyist Porter Goss has something to do with it.

The Sunni powers are the worst kind of allies but they aren't wrong about the rogue theocratic axis.  The Islamic Republic of Iran is controlled by a Twelver Shia Armageddon cult of revolution hijacking Bonapartists, pseudo-democratic Bolshevists, and sadistic senior citizens with a lust for WMD who lead the world in terror sponsorship, human rights violations, executions, and abuse of civil liberties.  Their private Libyan fascist militia Hezbollah has a nifty flag featuring a not at all subtle mushroom cloud, as if promotion of the Rosetta Stone of anti-Semitism aka the Protocols of the Elders of Zion weren't despicable enough.  The Islamic Republic has been successful at keeping their overwhelmingly young population of regime haters from executing a coup, but their Alawite subsidiary in Syria, the Ba'athist mass murderer Bashar Al Assad has not had the same luck keeping his prison riot of a country under control.

The Syrian Civil War is quite possibly the most confusing conflict in history with the sectarian militias, foreign fighters, state proxies, side dealing enemies, jihadist guerillas and the criminal sex shame cult as alternative makeshift startup state with dystopian fantasy appeal for the young and repressed youth seeking the medieval slave state of their dreams.  The success of the Iranian cult and the survival of the genocidal tumor Assad would not be ongoing if not for their benefactor who is neither Shia or Alawite, the crimeboss, demigod, media magnate and "all things to all creeps" dictator leading the Russia Today Orthodox Church Federation to the ideal Russian imperial future: the Russian imperial past.  Vladimir Putin may seem like a mutant villain from a cyberpunk comic book, but he's much worse.

Imagine the absurdity of a former KGB bureaucrat with a predilection for poisoning, shooting and bludgeoning political opponents being elected, reelected and then claiming squatters rights in the Kremlin.  Once there he merges government with the imperial nostalgist-cum-Stalin revivalist colporteurs of arch-Christian national chauvinism in the Russian Orthodox church, reverses decades of nuclear non-proliferation, recycles the Sudetenland strategy in Crimea, and melds Europe's preeminent cultural felo de se in the masochistic far left and the sniveling far right.   He sashays his way across the wreckage of his Caligulan bacchanalia fueled by adrenaline, tabloid journalism standards and Mafia panache, and remakes his proud country into a bitter vassalage of his knavish personality, a dour thraldom of belligerent jingoism, and a quickly closing society of maimed subjects to a theocratic syndicate of crony corporatist oligarchs and feudal lords oblivious to their state of geopolitical Siberia and with Herculean poll numbers Putin comes to the rescue to "fight Isis." In fact he is the bodyguard of an empowered Assad and the errand boy for the rogue axis of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

 The goal whether he knows it or not is the crushing of Saudi Arabia, which is simultaneously pure tribalism and a totally legitimate threat to the security and economy of the region and the world. The increased influence of Iran and Russia, their support for Assad and the racism against Kurds, Yazidis and other ethnic and religious minorities makes ISIS the more attractive choice for Turkey and their neighbors.  This is obscene, but it is also the reality.

The presence of Russian troops along with Iran and Assad is going to be tough for the Islamic state and the other jihadist and radical groups fighting Assad in Syria.  The alliances between these groups and the regional regimes will be increasingly difficult to conceal as this conflict continues.

The western democracies should leave Syria to this emerging international disaster.  It does nobody any good to have Arab countries see the US and our allies as partners with Iran and Assad.  Let Russia be the visible enemy in that regard.  What western democratic open societies should do is focus efforts on Iraq and the Kurdish areas of Syria.  The strategy should be to support the Kurds, remove ISIS from all Kurdish areas and Iraq, in so doing humiliate ISIS militarily and drive them into Syria where there will no doubt be a clusterfuck of mammoth proportions.

There really is no winning strategy or path to victory conceivable in Syria with Russia and Iran so heavily involved.  We really can't say what victory in Syria would look like. We want to defeat ISIS and al Qaeda but everyone else wants to defeat Assad and Iran (and now Russia). We should define victory as securing Kurdish territory and removing ISIS from Iraq.

In Syria, apart from the Kurdish territory, we have good options.  If we side with the regional regimes we are putting ourselves at odds with our Kurdish friends and cooperating with parties that have different goals and conflicting agendas with regards to ISIS.  Siding with Assad was never an option and Russia can make the entire region their enemy by backing Iran and Assad without our involvement.

This is going to be a mess. It is time to take sides and declare to The Kurds and Yazidis and all people who wish to be free from terror and tyranny: "we are on your side and we are staying there until you're in and they're out."

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Your Other Left: United States & Turkey: an Exercise in Masochism


                   
The half billion dollar program to recruit and train a moderate Syrian rebel force to fight ISIS has been a failure. This is due largely to the fact that nearly everyone fighting in Syria is more interested in fighting Bashar Assad's government than fighting ISIS.  Its not like we in the west are fans of Assad (his biggest international fan is Vladimir Putin) but with the country in chaos and full of domestic and foreign warring factions, removal of Assad's government root and stalk would only perpetuate and worsen the chaos.  If some sense of order is restored then a new government would be a better prospect, especially if the civil servants, bureaucrats and military leadership can keep some semblance of continuity.  This is incredibly naive in light of everything we know about the Syrian civil war.  Assad is going to be removed and his government will be extirpated.  We cannot save him and we don't want to.  

Our alliance with regional players who are actively sabotaging our efforts makes the entire prospect of stabilizing Syria seem far fetched.  The United States relationship with Turkey is the most cringe-worthy example of this duplicitous trend. The willingness of Turkish officials to do business with ISIS and al Qaeda and refrain, until recently, to take any part in the fight against ISIS seems to have been forgotten.  The United States government seems to be ignoring the Turkish attacks on Kurdish fighters in Syria and Iraq and domestic police violence against Kurdish dissidents inside Turkey.  Turkish politics has descended into blatant authoritarianism.  The so called 'buffer zone' that Turkey wants between itself and Syria would be another in the series of new Berlin walls that are popping up all over the globe.  

This 'buffer zone' is least of all the distressing behavior of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan.  Since his party, the AKP, lost it's majority in recent elections, his covert support for ISIS and his unhinged paranoia about the Kurds and Assad have become more transparent and more well known.   We in the west can't even acknowledge the seriousness of ISIS as an enemy or measure our successes and failures on the battlefield since the administration, congress and the Pentagon have no coherent voice on this war. The assessment of this foe and the threat they pose has been delusional from the outset. The effort to motivate the various regional interests to work together against the Islamic State is a halfhearted approach to a serious problem.  Almost no regional party of importance is interested in the western objective which is eliminating ISIS as top priority



.
Turkey has worked hand in hand with ISIS and al Qaeda to fight the Kurds and the Assad regime and these relationships have not ended.  Saudi Arabia has been working with al Qaeda in Yemen.  Iran has a clear desire to fight ISIS, but they are terrible to the Kurds, supportive of terror groups in Yemen and have genocidal aspirations for Israel.  Iraq is just trying not to fall apart, but the Iranian influence has filled the void left by the US.  We can hope the new leadership can free itself from Iranian influence to some degree and make progress bringing moderate Sunnis back to the government. Iraq is still no accepting all of the arms the US has offered, and since they're the middle man between the US and the Peshmerga, this is an embarrassment.

The only people who are only interested in fighting ISIS happen to be the people who value pluralistic democracy, humanitarianism and equal rights above theocracy and tribalism.  The Kurds are eager to trade resources and ideas with any people that wish for such peaceful engagement.  Shouldn't the US policy be to double down on our support for the Kurds, who have been most effective at defeating and scattering ISIS from towns in Syria and Iraq, rather than this masochistic organizing strategy?

The creepy crawl of the Turkish state towards fascism and their known terror sponsorship should negate the longstanding relationship with the west, at least until democracy is restored and the police violence is stopped.  The various parties in the  region are more worried about Assad returning to power, greater Iranian or Saudi influence over Iraq and Syria, and Kurdish territorial expansion or establishment of a Kurdish state than about ISIS. Our efforts in Syria, Yemen, Iran and the region at large have put us on both sides of many confrontations.  Our support for Saudi Arabia in Yemen has helped al Qaeda. Our dealings with Turkey have hurt our Kurdish allies and helped ISIS and al Qaeda.  We don't need to cater to these regimes and double agent diplomacy serves only to drag this war

This absurd strategy is steeped in our geopolitical identity crisis.  Do we in the west care about preserving our principles and confronting undemocratic ideas? Might we forge new alliances with people because they share our values instead of the double agent diplomacy we've been mired in with burdensome friends like Saudi Arabia and Turkey? The fear of a Kurdish state is inspiring the Turkish collusion with ISIS and al Qaeda as much as the fear of Syrian Baathists returning to power.  The Kurds in Syria and Turkey, to their credit have said they do not want a state of their own but rather self determination and autonomy within existing states. 

While the Kurds have taken territory from ISIS, they've been hospitable to inhabitants and refugees and tried to deliver basic services.  Maybe what we ought to be doing is promoting the Kurds as an example of democratic ideals and altruism. A Kurdish state would be a strategic victory against the theocratic fascists and corrupt regimes in the middle east.

I think we ought to arm, support and equip the Kurds to completely secure Kurdish territory first.  From there we have several options and nine are certain to be available.  One possible outcome is that the Kurds defeating ISIS savagely and decisively will decimate the morale of ISIS fighters, dry up their recruitment and encourage others to fight ISIS in other territory.  Ultimately this whole fight requires unwavering leadership from the US and allies.  Part of that leadership may be to encourage Kurdish and international volunteer fighters to go beyond Kurdish territory simply to remove ISIS, free slaves and confiscate weapons and resources.  If the coalition is more committed to defeating these monsters, then the Kurds and other allies may be encouraged to take ISIS controlled territory for humanitarian purposes, not to hold the territory or annex it.  This means the forces fighting ISIS beyond Kurdish territory cannot fight under a Kurdish flag or Kurdish militia emblem.  A new regional force like NATO, if not NATO itself, including Kurdish, Iraqi, Syrian and international volunteers could take the remaining ISIS territory and hand it back to locals once peace is restored.  This is not too likely a scenario, but at the moment no good ideas seem likely.  Leadership is needed to defeat ISIS.  We need to forget this exercise in futility of begging others in the region to fight this enemy.  The US and UK have been in the middle east for so long that it's silly to pretend we can extricate ourselves while conducting air strikes and diplomacy.  We have alienated Arabs just by being there.  Lets go all in with the Kurds to defeat ISIS quickly, surge style, rather than continue a strategy that accepts ISIS as a long term reality.

Counter insurgency expert and pillow talk media source David Petraeus has been suggesting that the coalition work with the Syrian al Qaeda affiliate, al Nusra Front against ISIS since they are indeed more moderate than ISIS and he has successfully recruited al Qaeda militants in Iraq to assist US forces briefly in the past.  First of all, it isn't necessary to work with al Qaeda against ISIS since we are already working with both al Qaeda and ISIS through our masochistic relationship with Turkey. There is only one available option that would not indirectly aid at least one jihadist group, and that is to go all in with the Kurds to take and secure the Kurdish areas and remove ISIS from Iraqi cities. If we have military success and effectively diminish ISIS territory, the humiliation will start to dry up their recruitment and it will only be a matter of time before ISIS is isolated in Raqqa. At that point, everyone who was reluctant to help before will smell blood in the water and begin fighting over who will take Raqqa. In the meantime we will have killed a good amount of barbaric thugs and freed some slaves. Every minute we are not freeing slaves is a minute we are complicit in the slavery, rape and torture we have the means to stop. And nobody is going to tell me we have to work with al Qaeda to get this done.